|
![]() Streaming Radio | ![]() |
Real Estate |
Mortgage |
Automotive |
Employment |
|
Classifieds |
|
Media Kit |
|
||||||||
|
Builder plans 180 units in Aberdeen
The developer, Centex Homes LLC, hopes to build two distinct developments in town. Plans for the Renaissance at Aberdeen call for 120 units, while the Villages at Aberdeen calls for another 62. The Renaissance development would include a total of five buildings containing approximately 24 units each, to be built on County Road. Twenty of the units would be deemed low-income housing. The Villages would be built along Route 34 with eight of the 62 proposed units deemed low-income housing. Both concepts require a use variance to allow multifamily housing.
"It would be fruitless for them to continue," Leckstein said, referring to the developer. Regardless, several audience members accused Centex Homes of stalling on purpose. "It's not them," Leckstein told the group. "I cannot emphasize that enough." Attorney John Giunco, Red Bank, represented Centex Homes at the gathering. He answered questions from the crowd regarding the removal of trees on his client's property. Giunco reported that his client was issued a permit from the Department of Environmental Protection to remove the trees. After the meeting, a large group of residents congregated outside town hall, discussing the proposed developments and questioning Mayor David Sobel about the plans. Salem Place resident Bill Alexander said there is already a mosquito problem in the area of the proposed developments, and more houses would just exacerbate the problem. Alexander, along with many other residents, expressed concern about the consequences of overcrowding, parking and traffic. Resident Anthony Garaguso, a Republican candidate for Township Council, said the timing of the postponement was odd. "It's disappointing that certain board members were not properly prepared to hear the case," Garaguso said. "The Aberdeen Town Council should appoint people to the Zoning Board who will come to the meetings prepared to avoid repeat occurrences like this. This was a major disappointment to the citizens in attendance who took time out of their schedules to attend tonight's meeting." He continued, "I further question the moving of tonight's topic to Nov. 28. Nov. 28 is not listed as a Zoning Board meeting on the town calendar or town Web site. … Why wasn't this meeting rescheduled for a day already listed on the calendar as a Zoning Board meeting? Garaguso said he looks to the town calendar to see when meetings take place, and questioned how residents would know about the Nov. 28 meeting. At one point, Garaguso said he believed the decision was deliberately being postponed until after the election. Councilman Owen Drapkin, a Democrat, overheard this comment and responded. "This is the law - you can't do it," Drapkin said. "If you don't have the votes, you don't have the votes." |
|
|||||||